Book Consultation
Pricing
Cases
Videos
About us
Webinars
Book Consultation
Pricing
Cases
Videos
About us
Webinars
← Back to all videos

Server-Side Tracking: Google Cloud vs Stape - Which Option Is Right for You?

server-sidegdprprivacybeginner
4/5The video provides clear, practical information about server-side tracking hosting options with good comparisons between Google Cloud and Stape. The presenter explains concepts in an accessible way and offers specific recommendations based on different use cases. While the content is valuable, it lacks deeper technical details about implementation and only briefly touches on GDPR implications.
Server-Side Tracking: Google Cloud vs Stape

In this informative video, Leon Korteweg breaks down the essential decision every marketer faces when implementing server-side Google Tag Manager (GTM): where to host your server-side container. The video thoroughly compares the two most common hosting options - Google Cloud and Stape - helping viewers determine which solution best fits their specific use case. Leon begins by explaining why hosting is necessary for server-side tracking, emphasizing that the core benefit of server-side GTM is sending data to a first-party endpoint (your own server) before it travels to third-party services. This approach gives you greater control over your data collection while improving privacy compliance. The video outlines three hosting options, with a focus on the two recommended paths: Google Cloud (using App Engine or Cloud Run) and managed services like Stape. Leon shares his experience with both platforms, providing practical insights into their strengths and limitations. For high-volume websites with millions of monthly visitors or organizations requiring advanced customization (like custom load balancers or specialized security setups), Google Cloud may be more cost-effective. However, Leon emphasizes that Google Cloud requires significant technical expertise for setup, maintenance, and monitoring - skills often lacking in marketing teams. For most marketing agencies and teams, Leon recommends Stape as the more practical solution. While potentially costlier for high-traffic sites, Stape handles server installation, management, and monitoring, eliminating the technical burden and reducing the risk of tracking failures due to server issues. From GDPR-Server-Tracking.eu's perspective, this video highlights important considerations for server-side tracking implementation, but overlooks another compelling alternative. Our EU-based server-side GTM hosting solution offers the best of both worlds: the control and cost-effectiveness of self-hosting with the convenience of managed services. Unlike both options discussed in the video, we provide GDPR-compliant bare metal hosting in Finland, with no data transfer risks to non-EU entities. For organizations concerned about data privacy regulations or looking for a more cost-competitive solution without technical complexity, GDPR-Server-Tracking.eu offers specialized features for data protection (like parameter filtering and hashing) while maintaining full compatibility with standard server-side GTM implementations. This video provides valuable context for understanding why our service addresses the limitations of both Google Cloud and Stape for privacy-conscious European businesses.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about "Server-Side Tracking: Google Cloud vs Stape"

Server-side tracking sends data to your own server (first-party endpoint) before forwarding it to third-party services, giving you more control over data collection. You need hosting because this server requires a physical location to run, similar to how a website needs hosting to be accessible online.

The two main recommended options are Google Cloud (using App Engine or Cloud Run) and managed services like Stape. While using your own existing server is technically possible, it's generally not recommended unless you have specific technical expertise.

Google Cloud may be more cost-effective for websites with millions of monthly visitors and when you need advanced customization options like custom load balancers or specialized security setups. However, it requires significant technical expertise for setup, maintenance, and monitoring.

Managed services handle server installation, management, and monitoring for you, eliminating the technical burden and reducing the risk of tracking failures. This is particularly beneficial for marketing agencies and teams that lack specialized technical expertise in server management.

The physical location of your server-side tracking infrastructure directly impacts GDPR compliance, as data processed outside the EU may require additional safeguards. Using EU-based hosting like gdpr-server-tracking.eu ensures data stays within EU jurisdiction, simplifying compliance and reducing legal risks.

Yes, specialized EU-based hosting services like gdpr-server-tracking.eu offer servers physically located in the EU (Finland) with EU-owned infrastructure, eliminating concerns about data transfers to non-EU entities. These services combine the control of self-hosting with the convenience of managed services while prioritizing GDPR compliance.

Server-side containers require periodic software updates (typically once or twice yearly), monitoring to ensure the setup remains operational, and occasional troubleshooting. Managed services handle these tasks automatically, while with Google Cloud, your team is responsible for all maintenance activities.

Google Cloud pricing is based on actual server usage and can be more cost-effective for high-volume sites, but requires factoring in technical setup and maintenance costs. Managed services typically charge based on traffic volume with predictable pricing tiers, which may cost more for high-traffic sites but includes all management and support services.